The one-sentence summary
Words on their own often fail to communicate sufficiently, so try combining them carefully with visual imagery.
Want to buy the book? CLICK HERE
WHAT THE BOOK SAYS 
- We talk so much that we don’t think very well. Words have become our default thinking tool, but they are not enough.
- Vivid thinking is Visual Verbal and InterDependent.
- Our inner fox represents words, analytical and linear approaches, whilst the hummingbird is visual, synthesising and spatial – combining both approaches leads to the best ideas and counteracts waffle.
- The three levels on the Blah-Blahmeter are:
- Blah: boring message, complicated idea, with intent to illuminate
- Blah blah: foggy message, idea missing, with intent to obfuscate
- Blah blah blah: misleading message, a rotten idea, with intent to divert
- The system offers methods to unclutter, sharpen, discover, develop, and debunk. To develop your visual side, use vivid grammar:
- When you hear a noun or name, draw a portrait
- When you hear an adjective or quantity, draw a chart
- When you hear a preposition or list, draw a map
- When you hear a tense or history, draw a timeline
- When you hear a complex verb or sequence, draw a flowchart
- When you hear a complex sentence or ‘stew’ of information, draw a multivariable plot
WHAT’S GOOD ABOUT IT
- To check if your idea or message is any good, use the FOREST acronym (these dovetail with the
- 6×6 rule from his previous book The Back of a Napkin, in brackets):
- F: Does it have Form? (Who? What?)
- O: Can it be explained with Only the essentials? (How much?)
- R: Is the idea Recognizable? (Where?)
- E: Can it Evolve? (When?)
- S: Does it Span differences? (How?)
- T: is it Targeted? (Why?)
- BLUF is a military acronym for getting your message heard: Bottom Line Up Front – state your finding at the beginning, then elaborate if necessary.
- Anyone needing to decode a speech, message or document can use the system, or use it to determine whether your own proposed message or idea is any good.
WHAT YOU HAVE TO WATCH
- The subtitle (What to do when words don’t work) is somewhat misleading inasmuch as the author is proposing a ‘double-minded’ union of verbal and visual, rather than one method over the other.